Editorial Director
Managing Editor
 
PRESENTATION SUBMIT A PAPER STYLE GUIDE ARCHIVES ORDER
Michel Beine
Balazs Egert
Thierry Mayer
Bernhard Herz
Miguel Leon-Ledesma
Larry Dongxiao Qiu
Horst Raff
Maurice Schiff
Akiko Suwa-Eisenmann
Mathias Thoenig
Wing Thye Woo
Philippe Aghion
Steve Ambler
Philippe Bacchetta
Marius Brülhart
André Cartapanis
Yin-Wong Cheung
Simon J. Evenett
Paul de Grauwe
Marion Jansen
Ronald Mac Donald
Paul Masson
Jacques Melitz
Peter Neary
Joaquim Oliveira Martins
Gianmarco Ottaviano
Roberto Perotti
Luca Ricci
Jacques-François Thisse
English
  N°120  
Issue 4 2009  

Double Dividend and Distribution of Welfare:
Advanced Results and Empirical Considerations

 
Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline
Mouez Fodha
 
The objective of this paper is to analyze the efficiency and equity consequences of the implementation of an environmental tax. Do the two purposes collide or can they be simultaneously achieved? Using results of the related literature, we show that precise conditions have to be met in order to achieve three goals: increase of the environmental quality, increase of the economic efficiency and improvement of the intergenerational equity. Are such theoretical conditions likely to occur? What are the rooms of manoeuvre for an environmental tax reform in the European countries? In each of them, the revenues of the existing environmental taxes are low in comparison to the weight of the labor taxes (which are highly distortionary). Using European data, we show that, among all the European countries, Belgium, France and, surprisingly, Sweden, exhibit the less green tax system and offer the easiest opportunity to use the environmental tax as a mean to alleviate the tax burden on labor. Abstract
   
Environmental tax; heterogenous agents; welfare analysis; tax progressivity Keywords
D60; D62; E62; H23 JEL classification
Order form