|
||||||||
T H E F R E N C H C E N T R E F O R R E S E A R C H
A N D S T U D I E S O N T H E W O R L D E C O N O M Y The CEPII - Past CEPII Newsletters - PDF Format - Subscribe / Unsubscribe C O N T E N T S: FOCUS The World Economy in 2050: a Tentative Picture There is considerable interest for long term growth issues in the business and policymaking communities, in particular when it comes to addressing the future place of emerging countries and their ranking. One headline of the Economist in October 2010 teasing on “How India’s growth will outpace China’s” is a good example of this interest. The mechanisms leading to their rankings range from simple arithmetic to the actual engines of growth – an issue extensively studied in economics.
Arithmetic is of limited help, even if it illustrates how little growth differentials can re-shape the world economy in few decades. A growth differential of a single percentage point per year, cumulated over 40 years, for example, results in a 49% income gap, while a differential of two percentage points results in a gap of 121% and three percentage points a gap of 226%. Based on the same arithmetic and simple assumptions about productivity and demographic trends, Fogel (2007) predicts that the three largest economies in the world in 2040 will be China (40%), ahead of the United States (14%) and India (12%). However, the growth process is far from being mechanical and tackling the engines of growth is a challenging issue. Accumulation of physical and human capital, growth in total factor productivity (TFP) and energy constraints may vary over time. For instance, with a constant annual growth rate of 8%, China’s economy will grow 21-fold in the next 40 years, while a linear convergence of China’s annual growth rate from 8% to 3% over 40 years would result in ‘only’ 8-fold growth. These two scenarios would have entirely different implications for the world in terms of commodity markets, multinationals’ strategies, carbon emissions, geopolitics, etc. Although a very risky exercise, projecting the long run world economy is useful, beyond the guidance of business. Importantly, it also provides an indispensable baseline for global economic policy models, since the results of these simulations are often heavily dependent on the baseline path of the world economy. As thinking in global terms is increasingly relevant – think of environmental or trade policies – there is a growing need of theoretically founded projections. Against this background, the CEPII published in 2006 a first consistent scenario at the 2050 horizon for 103 countries based on a neo-classical growth model with two production factors (capital and labor), plus TFP growth dependent on human capital. Relative valuation effects were introduced, based on a simple Balassa-Samuelson effect: theresults suggested that China would represent 22% of world GDP in 2050. Between 2005 and 2050, China and India would experience a 13-fold and a 10-fold increase in GDP, respectively. Over the same period, GDP for advanced economies would “only” double (Germany, France, Japan) or, for some, triple (the United States). However, the United States would keep the first rank in the world GDP hierarchy: only a swap between Japan and China was expected to take place for the second rank, while India would jump from the 13th to the fifth position. The global economic crisis has provided powerful incentives to reconsider these long-term projections, for two reasons: (i) advanced economies have suffered much more than emerging ones during and after the crisis, while developing countries have proved quite resilient; (ii) global imbalances may be much more long-lived than initially thought, so the convenient assumption of a closed economy to model capital accumulation (used in the 2006 paper) may be inadequate. Furthermore, existing projections generally do not account for the energy constraint that will undoubtedly be binding at the 2050 horizon. Consistently, in December 2010 the CEPII issued an updated set of long-term projections for 128 countries, introducing two new elements: 1. the energy constraint (through adding energy as a production factor) 2. a non-unitary relationship between savings and investment, which departs from assumptions of either a closed economy or full capital mobility. The projection is initialized in 2013, hence when the output gap can be assumed to be closed in most countries (IMF projections are used for the 2008-2012 period). Finally, the Balassa-Samuelson effect for relative prices is calibrated so as to be fully consistent with the three-factor growth model. Accounting for relative price variations, the results suggest that China’s and India’s GDPs could grow 16-fold and 21-fold, respectively, between 2008 and 2050. Meanwhile, the US economy would only double and the European Union would grow by a mere 40%. In approximately 2025 China would overtake the United States, and India would overtake Japan. In 2050, China would represent 28% of the world economy, outdoing the United States (14%), India (12%), the European Union (9%) and Japan (3%) (see Figure below However, in terms of living standards, measured as GDP per capita in purchasing power parity, only China would be close to achieving convergence to US levels, and only at the end of the simulation period. Hence these new projections tend to give credit to an acceleration of the move of the world’s economy gravity centre towards emerging countries and more specifically China and India. It should however be kept in mind that any exercise of this type is heroic and should be used with great caution. To put this exercise in perspective, we must think of looking at the post 2008 crisis world economy through our pre-first oil shock glasses. Figure: Shares of the world economy, 2008, 2025 and 2050
Source: Fouré, Bénassy-Quéré and Fontagné (2010). References: Fogel, R., Capitalism and Democracy in 2040: Forecasts and Speculations, NBER Working Paper, W13184, 2007. Fouré, J., Bénassy-Quéré, A. & Fontagné, L., The World Economy in 2050: a Tentative Picture, CEPII Working Paper, N° 2010-27, December 2010. Poncet, S., The Long Term Growth Prospects of the World Economy: Horizon 2050, CEPII Working Paper, N° 2006-15, October 2006. Financial Development and Trade Performance in China
The attention has long been drawn on the apparent inefficiency of China's financial system, and on the surprising fact that the Chinese economy has achieved high growth rates despite this handicap. The paradox is especially apparent when looking at the export sector, which has been growing at even higher rates over the past 25 years. This seems to contradict results from the recent literature on the link between finance and trade, which has shown theoretically, and empirically in cross-country studies, that a well-functionning financial intermediation system was crucial for export activity, due to the presence of specific fixed costs for accessing foreign markets.
In this research we aim at answering this puzzle, using export data with information on the province of origin; we exploit variation in financial system development across provinces, coupled with variation in finance intensivity at the sector level, to test if the level of inefficiency in financial intermediation has a distortive impact on the structure of Chinese exports. In addition, we also exploit information on the ownership type of exporting firms, distinguishing between foreign-owned, domestic private-owned and state-owned firms, and joint ventures. When fully controlling for province-level variables, we find contrasted results depending on how financial development is measured. The liquidity ratio, a standard measure in empirical studies, has a clear positive impact on export growth. By contrast, measures of the structure of financial markets, such as the share of state-owned banks in the banking sector, or of the openness of the banking sector to foreign entry, have an influence through a redistribution of export activity across firm types, but with no net impact on aggregate exports. We also find evidence that the ownership type determines the degree of access to credit, and that firms adapt by sorting themselves into sectors with high or low needs in finance. Putting these results together suggests that the high level of liquidity in China on one hand, and the sorting of firm types according to varying degrees of credit constraint on the other, help explaining the outlying position of China in the finance-export relationship. Joachim Jarreau & Sandra Poncet
The Consequences of Banking Crises for Public Debt
In the context of the aftermath of the recent financial crisis this study considers past historical episodes to examine what has happened to public debt over the medium and long term, The research provides estimates of the dynamic impact that banking crises episodes have typically had on the gross debt-to-GDP ratio, and of the role that structural and policy variables have had in shaping this response. The analysis complements previous work analysing the fiscal costs associated with banking crises in several respects by:
• Focusing on gross public debt as a dependent variable. • Focusing on the debt-to-GDP ratio rather than the percentage change in debt levels. First, the debt-to-GDP ratio is a better measure to assess fiscal sustainability. Second, analysing the percentage increase of debt levels in the aftermath of banking crises could lead to possible misinterpretations since the percentage increase crucially depends on the initial level of the debt before the occurrence of the crisis. • Presenting inferential empirical evidence on the increase of the debt-to-GDP ratio in the aftermath of banking crises. • Estimating the effect of banking crises on the debt-to-GDP ratio both in the short and in the long run, in particular to assess whether fiscal costs associated with the crises have been permanent or if they have tended to dissipate in the long term. • Analysing the heterogeneity of responses among different countries and episodes. Using an unbalanced panel of 154 countries from 1970 to 2006, and estimating impulse response functions of public debt to banking crises we find that banking crises have produced a significant and long-lasting increase in the government debt-to-GDP ratio, with the effect being a function of the severity of the crisis. In particular, for severe crises, comparable to the current one in terms of output losses, the government debt-to-GDP ratio is found to increase by up to 50 percentage points at the peak, and by 37 percentage points in the medium term (eight years after the crises onset). The effect is considerably lower for moderate crises. The increase in public debt in the aftermath of banking crises depends not only on the severity of the crises but also on country-specific characteristics. In particular, analysing a set of structural and policy variables larger increases in debt are found to occur in countries with higher initial debt-to-GDP ratios and with a larger share of foreign debt. Davide Furceri & Aleksandra Zdzienicka
On the Link Between Credit Procyclicality and Bank Competition
The link between bank competition and banking system stability has recently drawn a renewed interest. Two approaches have emerged in the literature: the “competition-fragility” view according to which a rise in bank competition may destabilize the banking system, and the “competition-stability” for which more competition between banks has positive effects on the banking system stability.
From an empirical viewpoint, results are somewhat mixed regarding the superiority of one approach over the other. This absence of clear-cut findings may be due to various factors, such as the lack of a unique measure of bank competition, or the fact that the link between bank competition and banking system stability may be polluted by endogeneity problems—the degree of bank competition being potentially dependent on the stability of the banking system. In addition to these factors, we think that the measure retained for the stability of the banking system may also play a crucial role. While the previous literature mainly focuses on risk exposure indicators or on probability of bank failures, we suggest to add a new dimension to the analysis by measuring the banking system stability through the credit procyclicality. Within this framework, our aim is to investigate the link between banking system stability—apprehended through the credit dynamics—and banks' market power. More specifically, we aim at studying whether credit procyclicality—i.e. the response of the credit market to a shock on GDP—is more important when the degree of banking competition is higher. We consider a sample of 17 OECD countries over the 1986-2009 period, and rely on the panel VAR (PVAR) modeling by accounting for the heterogeneity of countries in terms of their degree of bank competition. Vincent Bouvatier, Antonia López & Valérie Mignon
FDI from the South: "La raison d'être" and consequences for the North
The share of developing and transition countries in the global foreign direct investment (FDI) outflows has doubled in the last 20 years, reaching 16% of the total FDI outflow stock. This process has not been only driven by an active role of China, whose share amounts to 6 percent of total FDI stemming from developing countries. Other important
investors are Brazil, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Singapore and the UAE, who together accounted for 72 percent of the total South FDI outflows in 2008. Most of the investment flows from developing countries go to other developing and transition economies, giving rise to the term “South-South FDI” and amounting to one-third of the total foreign investment in emerging economies.
The goal of this study is to understand the determinants of these investment flows, and their differences vis-à-vis more traditional FDI from developed countries (“the North”), as well as their implications for receiving countries and for investors form developed economies. Relying on a novel dataset of bilateral FDI flows over the past decade, and working within gravity model framework, we demonstrate that FDI from the South has a more regional focus than investment stemming from the North. In contrast with North investors, institutional distance between countries does not seem to deter investors from the South, and it even serves as a source of comparative advantage for emerging economies. We also find that investment flows from the North and South exhibit a complementary, or crowding-in, rather than substitute relationship, which we attribute to different investment behaviors of these investors. The latter finding is good news for both Northern investors and for South receiving countries, who see different investment opportunities grasped by different investors, rather than southern corporations competing head-to-head with their northern counterparts to earn market share.
The World Economy in 2050: a Tentative Picture Jean Fouré, Agnès Bénassy-Quéré & Lionel Fontagné Determinants and Pervasiveness of the Evasion of Customs Duties Sébastien Jean & Cristina Mitaritonna On the Link Between Credit Procyclicality and Bank Competition Vincent Bouvatier, Antonia López-Villavicencio & Valérie Mignon Are Derivatives Dangerous? a Literature Survey BACI: International Trade Database at the Product-Level. The 1994-2007 Version Guillaume Gaulier & Soledad Zignago Indirect Exporters Fergal McCann Réforme des retraites en France : évaluation de la mise en place d'un système par comptes notionnels Xavier Chojnicki & Riccardo Magnani The Art of Exceptions: Sensitive Products in the Doha Negotiations Christophe Gouel, Cristina Mitaritonna & Maria Priscila Ramos Measuring Intangible Capital Investment: an Application to the "French Data" Vincent Delbecque & Laurence Nayman Clustering the Winners: the French Policy of Competitiveness Clusters Lionel Fontagné, Pamina Koenig, Florian Mayneris & Sandra Poncet The Credit Default Swap Market and the Settlement of Large Defaults Virginie Coudert & Mathieu Gex The Impact of the 2007-2010 Crisis on the Geography of Finance Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Yamina Tadjeddine Socially Responsible Investing: it Takes More than Words Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Stéphanie Monjon A Case for Intermediate Exchange-Rate Regimes Véronique Salins & Agnès Bénassy-Quéré Gold and Financial Assets: Are There Any Safe Havens in Bear Markets? Virginie Coudert & Hélène Raymond European Export Performance Angela Cheptea, Lionel Fontagné & Soledad Zignago The Effects of the Subprime Crisis on the Latin American Financial Markets: an Empirical Assessment Gilles Dufrénot, Valérie Mignon & Anne Péguin-Feissolle CEPII Working Papers are available free, on-line, in PDF format.
LA LETTRE DU CEPII,
MONTHLY
Can the Democratic Party of Japan Implement a New Economic Policy? N° 301, 14 September 2010 In August 2009, for the first time since 1955, an opposition party, the Democratic Party of Japan, won a clear mandate to form a new government, ousting the incumbent Liberal Democratic Party. Its initial economic reform programme of refocusing growth on domestic demand using large social transfers has come under severe political pressure, including within the current majority, with the supporters of Naoto Kan in favour of reining in budget spending and those of Ichiro Ozawa partisans of a vigorous economic stimulation policy. Naoto Kan’s election as President of the Democratic Party keeps him in the post of Prime Minister and seems to confirm the shift in the DPJ’s economic policy towards one of tighter control of public finances.
Eurozone Crisis: Debts, Institutions and Growth
N° 300, 28 June 2010 The Eurozone crisis is much more than a sovereign debt crisis. It calls into question the whole architecture of economic policy, from monetary policy to macroeconomic surveillance and sanctions. Beyond the short-run urgencies, EU members need to come out with a clear view of what kind of coordination device they want to invent. There are several routes forward, but failing to select one could contribute to marginalizing the Eurozone in the global economy. Agnès Bénassy-Quéré & Laurence Boone
The G20 in the Aftermath of the Crisis: a Euro-Asian View
N° 299, 25 June 2010 This Letter du CEPII draws on the meeting of the fifth Asia-Europe Economic Forum held in Tokyo on 25 March 2010. The forum brought together a broad range of participants including policymakers, academic experts and private sector specialists. This year, the agenda focused on reforms, national budgets, G20 hopes from both Asian and European perspectives. After focusing in the midst of the crisis on the international financial regulation reform, the G20 has launched at the Pittsburgh summit in September 2009 the Framework for Strong, Sustainable, and Balanced Growth. The rebalancing of global growth requires exit strategies differentiated across countries, structural reforms and a better fiscal coordination in Europe. Moreover, a question remains: the G20 has reacted promptly at the height of the crisis, but it has to prove its legitimacy and its ability to achieve reforms although the appetite for coordination decreases. Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, Fan He, Masahiro Kawai, Yung Chul Park & Jean Pisani-Ferry
China: the End of the Outward-Oriented Growth Model
N° 298, 21 April 2010 China, which since the 1980s has developed a dynamic export sector in order to drive its economic development, was hit hard by the collapse in global demand in late 2008. This episode revealed the fragility of the Chinese growth model, which is currently at a crossroads, not only as a result of the global context but also owing to the internal tensions it has caused. The results of thirty years of economic openness, as evidenced by CEPII studies, show that China's outstanding successes on international markets also have adverse effects and cannot be deemed to constitute a long-term development strategy. CEPII analyses are now assessing the changes that may occur in Chinese supply and the need to refocus growth on internal demand. Baseline
BASELINE is the database developed by the CEPII in 2010 to picture THE WORLD ECONOMY IN 2050. Environmental Policy: Lessons from Economic Theory Organized by the CEPII, the French Ministry for Ecology, the International Economics Journal, the Université Catholique de Louvain and the University of Lille I Paris, January 12, 2011 |
||||||||
| The contents of this issue were finalised December 16, 2010 | ||||||||
|
||||||||